|
|
Comment Text |
Response Date |
| 1. | I like many of the stories that are featured there, but find the "review" feature hard to use and to understand. Often when I click something it doesn't take me where I think it will. | May 26, 2009 9:09 AM |
| 2. | I would like the presentation of the news to be more user friendly. I get tired of going through the details which are necessary in a way, but quite tiresome for someone who wants to get everything in a nutshell. | May 25, 2009 6:33 AM |
| 3. | I think NewsTrust is a promising approach, I like the idea of constructive exchange most, but I also
appreciate that NewsTrust takes the risk of freely combining possibly diverging attitudes on some of
the most crucial topics to give the possibility of informed discussion. You could improve the presence
of NewsTrust online by providing links to ScienceDaily and New York Times, for example, where I
sometimes wished to be able to connect to your service. I agree there is a risk of adding reviews
concerning humanities or science, but I am sure it is worth to give a try, especially with publications
like "Current Anthropology" or "Anthropological Linguistics" in mind. | May 24, 2009 9:57 AM |
| 4. | I think overall it's a good concept. What i like the most is that the site focuses on actual news and not fluff, and love the idea of article credibility and the peer reviews that allow for different points of view for the article. What I like the least is that most stories only seem to have a couple of reviews. For improvements, the first thing that jumps out at me is that even though the design of the site is ok, and for having a lot of ocntent is all seaparted out pretty well, but when i look at the page nothing jumps out at me...too many words at too similar colors at too similar font sizes. MY first reaction is that I don't want to read any of it, and I have to remind myself that there is good content here. | May 20, 2009 2:07 PM |
| 5. | I occasionally look through the News Trust site, and have reviewed a few stories. Frankly, the Huffington Report pre-selects stories that I'm interested in, and I just don't have the time to sort through all the articles that are not timely or relevant to my concerns. | May 20, 2009 10:59 AM |
| 6. | I like that it keys you in to particular issues easily | May 20, 2009 8:30 AM |
| 7. | I do not like the email format, I have to really look at the information instead of having the stories flagged like have them bolded etc so instead of reading I am able to scan. I think it would improve the amount I read....thanks | May 20, 2009 8:23 AM |
| 8. | I really like it - I think it's easy to use and am trying to get in the habit of reviewing frequently. I am also looking forward to using it in classes.
It's ease of use is great - also the option to different levels of reviews is convenient. Having definitions available for the different types of news stories would be useful to me, since I'm not a journalist and sometimes don't know how to classify an article. | May 20, 2009 7:15 AM |
| 9. | Balanced reactions to events | May 20, 2009 4:30 AM |
| 10. | One of the best,grat writers,great stories,tells it like it is,I like every thing about it,as far as I am concerned it needs no improvement. | May 19, 2009 5:37 PM |