Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Comments Summary
 
Displaying 1 - 10 of 160 responses    « Prev   Next »  Jump To:   Go » 
   Comment Text Response Date
 1.I don't think you'll find many people willing to read three stories just to answer the question of which one is most factual. My own behavior is to read the story whose headline interests me. It's reasonable to ask us to rate what we are interested enough in to read, but not to read a number of stories in order then to rate them. May 26, 2009 9:11 AM 
 2.I think it is fine to have a bold headline. But I don´t think you will have to give pictures of reviewers. May 24, 2009 10:03 AM 
 3.it is more visually streamlined & easier on the eyes in sorting out what is where & isolate stories of interest May 23, 2009 10:58 AM 
 4.Initially it underwhelmed, then I compared all the aspects (new vs old) and I have to say that on all levels it rocks. The old one by comparison is confusing, there's no clear distinction between the various aspects of the site. The different shades of blue work well in the new one (the old one looks bland now). I especially like the highlighted story with the favicon :) May 21, 2009 7:59 AM 
 5.It's better than the current. but most of my previous comments still apply. For example, on the upper left area, there are blue links over a blue background. May 20, 2009 2:10 PM 
 6.Take a look at the Organic Consumer Union's web page. Your new format is getting closer to their approach, but honestly ... I'm looking for a progressive/intelligent stance for my news presentation. May 20, 2009 11:02 AM 
 7.I like the material included on the web page, it's very engaging. But still, the design is TOO dry. It doesn't capture the eye enough. Loosen up! May 20, 2009 8:35 AM 
 8.i like the tabbed "most recent | most trusted" setion in the old site. if you could keep that, along with the new look, which does visually separate the page parts, it would be great. May 20, 2009 7:17 AM 
 9.The blue ground with reverse type is difficult to decipher on an iPhone- sans serif typefaces are great for short lines (heads) but the eye needs serifs for blocks of text in the body of the article. May 20, 2009 4:44 AM 
 10.I dont care what the home page looks like,just the content May 19, 2009 5:38 PM