|
|
Comment Text |
Response Date |
| 1. | feeds from standout individuals might be worthwhile. | May 26, 2009 9:13 AM |
| 2. | There's a place for Smart Feeds, but sometimes interesting "news" is initiated by the "little guy" who happens to be on the spot ... Consider the "breaking news" examples of Twitter, of which there are many.
In a nutshell, leverage the power of citizen/community reporting in addition to the greatest minds in "link journalism". | May 21, 2009 8:11 AM |
| 3. | again, more interested in the actual news than the people reporting on it. | May 20, 2009 2:16 PM |
| 4. | Popularity does not equal quality. Filtering is good and extremely necessary. The filter of popularity is probably not a good one. | May 20, 2009 11:07 AM |
| 5. | I dislike Twitter, Facebook, My Space etc, so I would not be interested in writing from other blogs | May 20, 2009 8:38 AM |
| 6. | Filtering & linking | May 20, 2009 4:57 AM |
| 7. | not interested | May 19, 2009 5:42 PM |
| 8. | I like the focus on "smart" rather than "feeds." I like knowing that an article has been run past many great minds and has passed not only the smell test but also the accuracy test of those in the know on particular topics. | May 18, 2009 10:40 AM |
| 9. | This is not a top priority for me. Journalists have a tendency to roll with the populist flow. | May 18, 2009 7:01 AM |
| 10. | sounds good but I don't know if I would spend all that time using it. | May 16, 2009 10:00 PM |