Exit this survey >>
BYOL Session Evaluation 2011
Please provide the title or main presenter for one byol at a time.
1
. Choose the title or main presenter of the BYOL session.
BYOL Title
BYOL Main Presenter
BYOL Sessions
10 Open Source Software Packages You'll Love!
7 Free Mobile Participation Tools for Classrooms
Alternative Assessment Strategies Using the Mahara ePortfolio System
Around the World with Google Earth and Google Maps
Beyond Words: Using Infographics to Help Kids Grapple with Complexity
Bookmarks, PLNs, and More: Supercharge your Learning, Teaching, and Research
Bring Your Own Cell Phone: Collaborative Activities for the Classroom
Building Oral Fluency: It Really is that Easy with Technology
Classroom Instruction that Works: There's an App for That
Collaborations around the Planet: Social Networking for Educational Videoconferencing
Collaborative Online Tools: The Digital Age Teacher's Frenemies
Comic Integration: Add Some POW to Your Classroom!
Connecting Mathematical Practices and Content Development with NCTM Online Resources
Creating a Mobile Learning Initiative Using QR Codes
Creating Student Projects on the iPad
Differentiating for Elementary Special Needs Students Using the Ipad
Digital Collaboration Tools: Digging Deeper through Literacy and Inquiry Strategies
Diving into the iPad: Exploring Innovative Elementary Content
Drupal for Education: Latest Trends and New Ways to Get Started
Engage Students in Citizen Science with Web-Based Mapping and Multimedia
Engage Students with Mobile Learning & Edmodo
Evaluate Websites by Identifying, Capturing, and Illustrating
Explore Adaptive Curriculum: Online Math/Science for Middle/High School Students
Formative Assessment: Technology-Enhanced Approaches to Increase Student Achievement
Free Digital Tools to Reach Reluctant Writers
Getting Geeky with Google Apps
GigaPan Outreach Project: Using Technology to Promote Cultural Understanding
Glogster EDU: Creative Expression of Knowledge and Skills
Google Earth for Geeky Teachers: Structuring Learning through Locations
Google Earth, GPS, and Web 2.0: Creating Interactive Explorations
Google Forms for Teachers and Administrators
Google Forms: More than Just Multiple Choice
Igniting Learning through Interactive Use of SMART Technologies
Innovative Technology in Science Inquiry
JASON Mission Center: Engaging Students and Teachers with Online Resources
Learning Computer Programming while Gaining Digital Age Skills
Making Text Accessible to Struggling Students
Mash-Ups in the Classroom
Math 2.0: Scenes from the Dynamic Math Classroom
NETS in Action: Online Resources By and For Educators
OER Glue: Leveraging Open Education Resources and Popular Tools
Online Resources for Cybersafe Students
Open Educational Resources: Share, Remix, Learn
Ostracism and Bullying: An Online Case Study for Educators
Print, Cut, and Fold: Technology-Infused Graphic Organizers and Desktop Publishing
ReadWriteThink.org: Tips and Tricks
Real Stories, Real Stuff: Online Resources from Smithsonian's History Explorer
Science-ICT: Integrating Information, Communication, and Technology Skills for Science Classes
Serious Play: 5th Grader Presents M.I.T.'s Scratch Programming Language
Serve an All-You-Can-Learn Buffet: Digital Age Differentiation
Simple Ideas for Powerful Sharing
Social Studies, Language Arts, Science + Google Apps = The Future
Teach Your Students Game Design in One Week
Teaching with Moodle: Tips for Enhanced Course Design
Technology for Improving Staff Morale
The Art of the Remix: Incorporating Collaborative Writing in the Classroom
The New 3G: Going Gaga 4 Google!
The Presidential Timeline: Create Your Own Timeline
the.News: Interactive Engaging Mash-up Video Software in the Clouds
To Infinity and Beyond with Innovative Online Discussions and Projects
Tools for Teaching Students at the Top of Bloom's Taxonomy
Use Your Noodle--Learn Moodle: An Open Source Learning Management System
Using a Social Network as Learning Management System
Using VoiceThread for Interactive Projects
Video Games, Computer Science, and Algebra: An Integrated Approach
Visual Computer Models for Teaching Fractions: Free Online Tools
We're getting engaged! Using POVs in Social Studies/ Language Arts
Web Tools that Work in a Real-Life Classroom
Wonderful World of Wikis for Intermediate and Advanced
Working with Wikis: Learning and Collaborating in a Virtual Space
Writing 2.0: Using Google Docs to Improve Student Writing
Choose the title or main presenter of the BYOL session. BYOL Sessions BYOL Title
Amboe, Kevin
Ball, Aaron
Bentley, Robert
Burdick, Katherine
Cassinelli, Colette
Charischak, Ihor
Christie, Alice
Clark, Paul
Clay, Jack
Clough, David
Coquillon, Naomi
Craft, Christopher
Dachos, Jim
Davis, Vicki
Davis, Vicki
DeLeeuw, Sarah
Dreyfus, Michael
Duffin, Joel
Edyburn, Dave
Elmer, Alison
Englander, John
Fasimpaur, Karen
Feldman, Lori
Fink, Lisa
Fink, Lisa
Fryer, Wesley
Gann, Kara
Gieser, John
Harris, Anita
Holland, Jim
Holland, Jim
Hubbell, Elizabeth
Hurley, Rushton
Hurley, Rushton
Johnson, Vivian
Khalsa, Arjan
Kmiec, Joanne
Kogan, Nate
Krauss, Jane
Laguna, Catherine
Laguna, Catherine
Lim, Janine
Lin, Muilenburg
Lo, Burt
Molishus, Maryann
Moore, Michelle
Moore, Michelle
Moran, Pete
Murphy-Genter, JoAnn
Norris, Patricia
Orwin, Randy
Pahomov, Larissa
Pearson, Alex
Perkins, Jessica
Plough, Cory
Price, Geoff
Repenning, Alexander
Resta, Paul
Rice, Margaret
Rose, James
Schlegelmilch, Mary
Stack, Tim
Staudt, Carolyn
Tedesco, Stephen
Tucker, Catlin
Walker, Cathy
Walsh, Chris
Whalen, Betsy
Whitley-Grassi, Nathan
Wozniak, Sandra
Zaorski, Spence
BYOL Main Presenter
2
. Check the responses that best describe your evaluation of this session.
Strongly Agree
Mostly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Mostly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
1. The session content matched the description.
*
Check the responses that best describe your evaluation of this session. 1. The session content matched the description. Strongly Agree
1. The session content matched the description. Mostly Agree
1. The session content matched the description. Agree
1. The session content matched the description. Disagree
1. The session content matched the description. Mostly Disagree
1. The session content matched the description. Strongly Disagree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session.
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Strongly Agree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Mostly Agree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Agree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Disagree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Mostly Disagree
2. The format of delivery (lecture, poster, etc.) was appropriate for the content and learning goals for the session. Strongly Disagree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging.
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Strongly Agree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Mostly Agree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Agree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Disagree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Mostly Disagree
3. The presenter(s) was (were) organized, well prepared, knowledgeable, and engaging. Strongly Disagree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn.
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Strongly Agree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Mostly Agree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Agree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Disagree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Mostly Disagree
4. The information was relevant, up to date, useful and, if applicable, in sync with current knowledge about how students learn. Strongly Disagree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge.
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Strongly Agree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Mostly Agree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Agree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Disagree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Mostly Disagree
5. The session proved useful by providing inspiration, new resources or instructional strategies, new ways of thinking, or helped me learn a new tool or skill or solve a challenge. Strongly Disagree
3
. Comments. (Specifics about why it was good or how it missed the mark or didn’t fit the format or description are helpful to the Program Committee.)
Comments. (Specifics about why it was good or how it missed the mark or didn’t fit the format or description are helpful to the Program Committee.)
Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.